THE CASE FOR AGV
Do the whole sum first. Then decide.
A machine is bought once and shows up as a single number; labour is paid monthly and hides in a dozen places. Compared over the same period, the question stops being “is an AGV expensive” and becomes “what does staying manual actually cost”.
01 / THE FOUR LAYERS
Only the first layer shows up on a payslip
{{ l.name }}
{{ l.items }}
You may disagree with any single figure. But once all four layers are on the table, the discussion changes shape — and that is the point of the exercise.
02 / WHAT YOU ACTUALLY GET
Eight things that change, beyond a headcount number
{{ g.name }}
{{ g.desc }}
Safety cannot be stated as “accidents will never happen”. The honest version: fewer people involved in high-frequency handling and a disciplined route plan reduce some preventable risk — the result still depends on site layout, configuration and management.
03 / WHAT WE NEED
Eight categories, and what each one is for
Every estimate we hand over states its basis: which figures you confirmed, which you estimated, which still need a site check, and which are only possible upside.
04 / HOW A PROJECT MOVES
Six stages from first conversation to an internal business case
We will not put a single AGV proposal in front of you. At stage three you get at least three options compared side by side — staying manual, optimising the manual process, and a partial pilot — because a decision only feels rational when the alternatives are on the table.
THE THREE OPTIONS COMPARED
{{ o.name }}
{{ o.desc }}
Every estimate states which figures you confirmed, which you estimated, which still need a site check, and which are only possible upside.
{{ s.name }}
{{ s.desc }}
05 / HOW WE PRESENT THE NUMBERS
Five things we will not do
{{ p.name }}
{{ p.desc }}
If it is not the right time, we will say so.
Send the handling tasks, the headcount and the shift pattern. We will come back with a model selection, a preliminary layout and a payback range — with the basis of every figure stated.
Request a quotation